Addressing the Felda Conundrum in Pakatan Harapan’s First White Paper
dc.contributor.author | Geoffrey K. Pakiam | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-03T16:23:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-03T16:23:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03-15 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2335-6677 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11540/9814 | |
dc.description.abstract | Once the crown jewel of Malaysia’s rural development drive, the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda)’s settler schemes are now approaching an inflection point. Years of gross corporate mismanagement, depreciating farm assets, and indifferent commodity prices have strangled the organisation’s cash flow to the point where it claims it can no longer afford to pay its settlers, staff and contractors on time. To help stave off Felda’s apparent looming bankruptcy, Malaysia’s new Pakatan Harapan-dominated parliament is due to table a much-anticipated White Paper before mid-April 2019, proposing strategic solutions to Felda’s current malaise. Settler representatives hope that the federal authorities will generously favour Felda settlers, turn back the clock, write off a large amount of settler debt, and help the group reclaim key assets now under the purview of FGV Holdings Bhd (FGV). Post-GE14, the Pakatan-led government, however, is saddled with broader responsibilities that complicate responses to Felda’s current woes. These include obligations to FGV’s new management and institutional shareholders, which besides Felda and related agencies (who together hold 38.8 percent of FGV’s shares), extend to statutory Islamic investment fund Lembaga Tabung Haji (7.78 per cent), public sector pension fund Kumpulan Wang Persaraaan (Diperbadankan) (7.83 per cent) and the state governments of Pahang (5 percent) and Sabah (4.07 per cent). Some form of compromise between different sectoral interests is virtually guaranteed, and will involve federal funding in one form or another. Paradoxically, this tricky situation comes just when Pakatan is facing an unprecedented opportunity to win the hearts and minds of rural Malay voters; an opportunity that may not be on offer again for some time. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute | |
dc.title | Addressing the Felda Conundrum in Pakatan Harapan’s First White Paper | |
dc.type | Reports | |
dc.subject.expert | Regional Development Finance | |
dc.subject.expert | Public Scrutiny of City Finances | |
dc.subject.expert | Non-Bank Financial Institutions | |
dc.subject.expert | Local Government Finance | |
dc.subject.expert | Government Financial Institutions | |
dc.subject.expert | Foreign and Domestic Financing | |
dc.subject.expert | Financial Risk Management | |
dc.subject.expert | Assessing Corporate Governance | |
dc.subject.expert | Good Governance | |
dc.subject.expert | Governance Approach | |
dc.subject.expert | Finance | |
dc.subject.expert | Public Finance | |
dc.subject.expert | Governance | |
dc.subject.expert | National Budget | |
dc.subject.expert | Budgetary Policy | |
dc.subject.expert | Educational Budget | |
dc.subject.expert | Public Financial Management | |
dc.subject.expert | Financial System | |
dc.subject.expert | Financial Statistics | |
dc.subject.adb | Public Accounting | |
dc.subject.adb | Business Financing | |
dc.subject.adb | Subsidies | |
dc.subject.adb | Social Equity | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic Equity | |
dc.subject.adb | Project Risks | |
dc.subject.adb | Project Impact | |
dc.subject.adb | Public Administration | |
dc.subject.adb | Corporations | |
dc.subject.adb | Taxation | |
dc.subject.adb | Public Debt | |
dc.subject.adb | Local Government | |
dc.subject.adb | Debt Management | |
dc.subject.adb | Corporate debt | |
dc.subject.adb | Taxation | |
dc.subject.adb | Public Accounting | |
dc.subject.adb | National Budget | |
dc.subject.adb | Municipal Bonds | |
dc.subject.adb | Local Government | |
dc.subject.adb | Taxation | |
dc.subject.adb | Public Debt | |
dc.subject.adb | Local Government | |
dc.subject.adb | Debt Management | |
dc.subject.adb | Pension Funds | |
dc.subject.adb | Mutual Funds | |
dc.subject.adb | Social Equity | |
dc.subject.adb | Financial Aspects | |
dc.subject.adb | Fiscal Policy | |
dc.subject.natural | Investment Requirements | |
dc.subject.natural | Banks | |
dc.subject.natural | |Taxing power | |
dc.subject.natural | Tax administration and procedure | |
dc.subject.natural | Tax policy | |
dc.subject.natural | Effect of taxation on labor supply | |
dc.subject.natural | Decentralization in government | |
dc.subject.natural | Community power | |
dc.subject.natural | Corporate divestment | |
dc.subject.natural | Civil government | |
dc.subject.natural | Delegation of powers | |
dc.subject.natural | Equality | |
dc.subject.natural | Neighborhood government | |
dc.subject.natural | Subnational governments | |
dc.subject.natural | Delivery of government services | |
dc.subject.natural | Local taxation | |
dc.subject.natural | Options | |
dc.subject.natural | Government | |
dc.subject.natural | Local government | |
dc.subject.natural | Taxation | |
dc.subject.natural | Employee pension trusts | |
dc.subject.natural | Investment management | |
dc.subject.natural | Investments | |
dc.subject.natural | Multiemployer pension plans | |
dc.subject.natural | Keogh plans | |
dc.subject.natural | Individual retirement accounts | |
dc.subject.natural | Pension plans | |
dc.subject.natural | Employee pension trusts | |
dc.subject.natural | Pension trusts | |
dc.title.series | ISEAS Perspective | |
dc.title.volume | Issue: 2019 No. 17 | |
dc.contributor.imprint | ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute | |
oar.theme | Finance | |
oar.theme | Governance | |
oar.adminregion | Southeast Asia Region | |
oar.country | Malaysia | |
oar.identifier | OAR-009404 | |
oar.author | Pakiam, Geoffrey K. | |
oar.import | TRUE | |
oar.googlescholar.linkpresent | true |