Tsunami risk: do we learn our way forward, or repeat the mistakes of the past?
Gill, Derek | September 2016
Abstract
New Zealand has just had its second ‘near miss’ with tsunami risk in three months. An earlier NZIER Insight (no. 63) covered how a tsunami warning was issued 1 hour 20 minutes after the earthquake centred offshore from Te Aroha on Friday 2 September. This warning was issued 1 hour 5 minutes after the arrival of the first wave.
The magnitude 7.8 earthquake that struck just after midnight on Monday 14 November again showed the shortcomings of our system for managing tsunami disaster risk. Sirens in places like New Brighton were activated 2 hours after the earthquake, while in Napier they were never used at all as, according to the CEO of Napier City Council, that “would have caused mass panic and evacuation”.
To put these times in perspective, the first 2-4 metre tsunami waves generated from Monday’s North Canterbury earthquake arrived in Banks Peninsula after one hour, and for Wellington, following any major earthquake on the subduction zone off the coast, arrival times are likely to be only 20 minutes!
Citation
Gill, Derek. 2016. Tsunami risk: do we learn our way forward, or repeat the mistakes of the past?. © New Zealand Institute of Economic Research. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/9200.Keywords
Results-Based Monitoring And Evaluation
Project Evaluation & Review Technique
Project Evaluation
Program Evaluation
Performance Evaluation
Operations Evaluation
Evaluation Methods
Evaluation
Disaster preparedness
Disaster prevention
Disaster management
Emergency relief
Flood control
Fire prevention
Natural disasters
Man-made disasters
Post-conflict recovery
Fragile states
Project impact
Development projects
Program management
Performance appraisal
Project appraisal
Technology assessment
Cumulative effects assessment
Grievance procedures
Participatory monitoring and evaluation
Show allCollapse