Public–Private Partnership Systems in the Republic of Korea, the Philippines, and Indonesia
Kim, Kang-Soo; Jung, Min-Woong; Park, Mee-Soo; Koh, Yoo-Eun; Kim, Jin-Oh | October 2018
Abstract
Infrastructure plays a critical role in boosting the economy’s overall productivity and development toward improving the quality of life. Public–private partnership (PPP) is considered as one of the key modalities for sustainable infrastructure development. This paper analyzes and compares the PPP systems in the Republic of Korea, the Philippines, and Indonesia to identify the requirements for making this modality an effective catalyst for infrastructure’s contribution to sustainable development. These countries have used the increased capacity and transactional experience in handling these partnerships to develop their PPP markets and strengthen their institutional framework to increase the use of PPPs to provide infrastructure services. A comparative analysis is then conducted to draw lessons for other economies in developing Asia seeking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their PPPs. The analysis underscores how strong institutions, unified procurement frameworks, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms can improve the implementation of infrastructure PPPs.
Citation
Kim, Kang-Soo; Jung, Min-Woong; Park, Mee-Soo; Koh, Yoo-Eun; Kim, Jin-Oh. 2018. Public–Private Partnership Systems in the Republic of Korea, the Philippines, and Indonesia. © Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/8805. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.ISSN
2313-6537 (print)
2313-6545 (electronic)
Keywords
Financial & Private Sector Development
Private Sector Investments
Private Sector Participation
Private Sector Projects
Public Sector Infrastructure
Public Sector Management
Public Sector Projects
Private enterprises
Private ownership
Government
Public enterprises
Public finance
Infrastructure projects
Development projects
Financial loss
Central local government relations
Administration
Decentralization in government
Subnational governments
Government monopolies
Intergovernmental fiscal relations
Investment of public funds
Local finance
Government services
State governments
Municipal government
Bank failures
Show allCollapse