Special Evaluation Study: Microfinance Development Strategy 2000: Sector Performance and Client Welfare (Complete Report)
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-10T10:16:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-10T10:16:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-09-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11540/3583 | |
dc.description.abstract | In the Asia-Pacific Region, microfinance is often seen as an effective instrument to help low-income households take advantage of economic opportunities and improve living standards. In May 2000, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved its microfinance development strategy to set out a strategic framework and broad guidance for its microfinance operations. Since then, ADB has provided $2.8 billion to support microfinance activities in 21 developing member countries (DMCs). This special evaluation study shows that ADB’s support has been relevant and responsive to the sector development needs of the DMCs. Overall, ADB support performed reasonably well at the macro level in easing regulatory and policy constraints. However, the results have been less than effective in market and institutional development, sustainability of microfinance operations, and outreach to the poor. The study shows that improvements in the policy environment and commercialization of microfinance did not necessarily result in greater outreach to the poor. Sector effectiveness depended on government commitment to reforms, absorptive capacity of institutions, and the country’s policy framework. The average penetration among the countries with ADB support remained low at nearly 20% of the population as of end 2011. Six case countries showed that fewer than 9% of microfinance clients lived below $1.25 per day and fewer than 22% lived below $2 per day. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Asian Development Bank | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo | |
dc.title | Special Evaluation Study: Microfinance Development Strategy 2000: Sector Performance and Client Welfare (Complete Report) | |
dc.type | Institutional Materials | |
dc.subject.expert | Economic Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Economic Infrastructure | |
dc.subject.expert | Economic Policies | |
dc.subject.expert | Regional Economic Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Microfinance Programs | |
dc.subject.expert | Public Finance | |
dc.subject.expert | Local Financing | |
dc.subject.expert | Financial Stability | |
dc.subject.expert | Financial Sector Regulation | |
dc.subject.adb | Enterprises | |
dc.subject.adb | Financial aid | |
dc.subject.adb | Economies in transition | |
dc.subject.adb | Local Finance | |
dc.subject.adb | Local Government | |
dc.subject.adb | Insurance Companies | |
dc.subject.adb | Banks | |
dc.subject.adb | Social Equity | |
dc.subject.natural | Social responsibility of business | |
dc.subject.natural | Accounting | |
dc.subject.natural | Personal budgets | |
dc.subject.natural | Cost and standard of living | |
dc.subject.natural | Bank accounts | |
dc.subject.natural | Credit control | |
dc.subject.natural | Regulatory reform | |
dc.subject.natural | Banks and banking | |
dc.title.series | Special Evaluation Study | |
dc.contributor.imprint | Asian Development Bank | |
oar.theme | Economics | |
oar.theme | Finance | |
oar.theme | Small Medium Business | |
oar.adminregion | Asia and the Pacific Region | |
oar.country | Bangladesh | |
oar.country | Bhutan | |
oar.country | India | |
oar.country | Maldives | |
oar.country | Nepal | |
oar.country | Sri Lanka | |
oar.country | Brunei Darussalam | |
oar.country | Cambodia | |
oar.country | Indonesia | |
oar.country | Lao People's Democratic | |
oar.country | Malaysia | |
oar.country | Myanmar | |
oar.country | Philippines | |
oar.country | Singapore | |
oar.country | Thailand | |
oar.country | Viet Nam | |
oar.country | Cook Islands | |
oar.country | Fiji Islands | |
oar.country | Kiribati | |
oar.country | Marshall Islands | |
oar.country | Federated States of Micronesia | |
oar.country | Nauru | |
oar.country | Palau | |
oar.country | Papua New Guinea | |
oar.country | Samoa | |
oar.country | Solomon Islands | |
oar.country | Timor-Leste | |
oar.country | Tonga | |
oar.country | Tuvalu | |
oar.country | Vanuatu | |
oar.country | Afghanistan | |
oar.country | Armenia | |
oar.country | Azerbaijan | |
oar.country | Georgia | |
oar.country | Kazakhstan | |
oar.country | Kyrgyz Republic | |
oar.country | Pakistan | |
oar.country | Tajikistan | |
oar.country | Turkmenistan | |
oar.country | Uzbekistan | |
oar.country | People's Republic of China | |
oar.country | Hong Kong | |
oar.country | China | |
oar.country | Republic of Korea | |
oar.country | Mongolia | |
oar.country | Taipei,China | |
oar.identifier | OAR-003961 | |
oar.author | Asian Development Bank | |
oar.import | true | |
oar.googlescholar.linkpresent | true |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Institutional Materials
Institutional materials are ADB-centric publications and similar materials from other institutions that have elements of being scholarly. Institutional materials may consist of administrative documents, strategy or policy notes and reviews, conference proceedings, operational reports, or project notes that may be of value to researchers and academics. It is possible that these materials may not serve as the primary resource for research work, but they may point researchers to the right direction and give supplemental data.