Special Evaluation Study: Knowledge Products and Services: Building a Stronger Knowledge Institution (Complete Report)
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-10T10:16:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-10T10:16:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-11-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11540/3580 | |
dc.description.abstract | Asia and the Pacific have made striking progress in economic development over the past three decades. At the same time, critical challenges and risks remain. External and internal shocks are frequent, yet unpredictable. In addition to economic shocks, the region is increasingly vulnerable to natural disasters, with escalating damage and significant loss of life as floodplain, coastal, and low-lying island populations continue to grow. Inclusive growth, food security, clean water and sanitation, maternal health— these are but a handful of other challenges facing the region. The diversity of challenges gives rise to a range of knowledge needs. Moreover, country contexts and capacities vary widely across the small, fragile, and low-income states to the larger, middle-income countries to the advanced knowledge-based economies. Binding knowledge constraints vary from one country to another. Knowledge management (KM) is more important than ever for development, placing greater demands on better knowledge products and services (KPS) from development institutions. Knowledge is key to linking distinct development efforts— connecting the dots—and to achieving better outcomes and greater impact from development resources. And yet, KM remains a complex and evolving field, with many organizations struggling to leverage knowledge more effectively to improve their operations and serve their clients better. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Asian Development Bank | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo | |
dc.title | Special Evaluation Study: Knowledge Products and Services: Building a Stronger Knowledge Institution (Complete Report) | |
dc.type | Institutional Materials | |
dc.subject.expert | Comprehensive Development Framework | |
dc.subject.expert | Development Challenges | |
dc.subject.expert | Development Planning | |
dc.subject.expert | Millennium Development Goals | |
dc.subject.expert | Policy Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Program Evaluation | |
dc.subject.expert | Performance Evaluation | |
dc.subject.expert | Evaluation Criteria | |
dc.subject.expert | Capital Market Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Development Economics | |
dc.subject.expert | Financial Sector Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Technology Development | |
dc.subject.expert | World Development Indicators | |
dc.subject.expert | Evaluation Methods | |
dc.subject.adb | Development assistance | |
dc.subject.adb | ADB | |
dc.subject.adb | Curriculum development | |
dc.subject.adb | Development assistance | |
dc.subject.adb | Development aid | |
dc.subject.adb | Development indicators | |
dc.subject.adb | Development potential | |
dc.subject.adb | Development models | |
dc.subject.adb | Project appraisal | |
dc.subject.adb | Performance appraisal | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic development | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic indicators | |
dc.subject.adb | Government programs | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic growth | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Industrial development | |
dc.subject.adb | Industrial policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Technology assessment | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic evaluation | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic forecast | |
dc.subject.adb | Input output analysis | |
dc.subject.natural | Communication in rural development | |
dc.subject.natural | Communication in community development | |
dc.subject.natural | Infrastructure | |
dc.subject.natural | Central planning | |
dc.subject.natural | Endowment of research | |
dc.subject.natural | Partnership | |
dc.subject.natural | Joint venture | |
dc.subject.natural | Nation-building | |
dc.subject.natural | Risk assessment | |
dc.subject.natural | Economic development projects | |
dc.subject.natural | Economic forecasting | |
dc.subject.natural | Industrial research | |
dc.subject.natural | Participatory monitoring and evaluation | |
dc.subject.natural | Economic policy | |
dc.subject.natural | Economic forecasting | |
dc.title.series | Special Evaluation Study | |
dc.contributor.imprint | Asian Development Bank | |
oar.theme | Development | |
oar.theme | Evaluation | |
oar.adminregion | Asia and the Pacific Region | |
oar.country | Bangladesh | |
oar.country | Bhutan | |
oar.country | India | |
oar.country | Maldives | |
oar.country | Nepal | |
oar.country | Sri Lanka | |
oar.country | Brunei Darussalam | |
oar.country | Cambodia | |
oar.country | Indonesia | |
oar.country | Lao People's Democratic | |
oar.country | Malaysia | |
oar.country | Myanmar | |
oar.country | Philippines | |
oar.country | Singapore | |
oar.country | Thailand | |
oar.country | Viet Nam | |
oar.country | Cook Islands | |
oar.country | Fiji Islands | |
oar.country | Kiribati | |
oar.country | Marshall Islands | |
oar.country | Federated States of Micronesia | |
oar.country | Nauru | |
oar.country | Palau | |
oar.country | Papua New Guinea | |
oar.country | Samoa | |
oar.country | Solomon Islands | |
oar.country | Timor-Leste | |
oar.country | Tonga | |
oar.country | Tuvalu | |
oar.country | Vanuatu | |
oar.country | Afghanistan | |
oar.country | Armenia | |
oar.country | Azerbaijan | |
oar.country | Georgia | |
oar.country | Kazakhstan | |
oar.country | Kyrgyz Republic | |
oar.country | Pakistan | |
oar.country | Tajikistan | |
oar.country | Turkmenistan | |
oar.country | Uzbekistan | |
oar.country | People's Republic of China | |
oar.country | Hong Kong | |
oar.country | China | |
oar.country | Republic of Korea | |
oar.country | Mongolia | |
oar.country | Taipei,China | |
oar.identifier | OAR-003949 | |
oar.author | Asian Development Bank | |
oar.import | true | |
oar.googlescholar.linkpresent | true |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Institutional Materials
Institutional materials are ADB-centric publications and similar materials from other institutions that have elements of being scholarly. Institutional materials may consist of administrative documents, strategy or policy notes and reviews, conference proceedings, operational reports, or project notes that may be of value to researchers and academics. It is possible that these materials may not serve as the primary resource for research work, but they may point researchers to the right direction and give supplemental data.