Trade Structure and the Transmission of Economic Distress in the High-Income OECD Countries to Developing Asia
dc.contributor.author | Juthathip Jongwanich | |
dc.contributor.author | William E. James | |
dc.contributor.author | Peter J. Minor | |
dc.contributor.author | Alexander Greenbaum | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-30T14:44:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-01-30T14:44:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-05-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1655-5252 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1812 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines the structure and direction of developing Asia’s trade over the past two decades. The impacts on developing Asia of the economic slowdown in 2009–2010 in high-income countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which includes the European Union (EU), Japan, and United States (US) are projected through a computable general equilibrium model (CGE) of world trade and production. In addition, the impacts of fiscal stimulus and the rise of protectionist sentiments within developing Asia are examined. The expansion of intraregional trade in Asia reflects the role of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as an assembly point and its reliance on demand from outside the region, the EU and the US in particular. The trade channel is crucial in transmitting economic distress from the OECD countries to developing Asia. The projection shows that developing Asia will continue to suffer from demand decline in OECD countries, with the PRC and India being the most impacted. Though Southeast Asia faces reduced exports to the OECD countries, its exports are reduced significantly to other Asian exporters, demonstrating the indirect trade linkages that now exist in the global economy. Fiscal stimulus from the largest economies (including PRC, EU, Japan, and US) could help boost trade and gross domestic product growth in developing Asia but it is not projected to offset entirely the negative impact from the global economic downturn. Protectionism has a negative impact on the countries and regions that take that course. Southeast Asia would be the most impacted by protectionism. If Southeast Asian countries were to raise their applied tariffs to the maximum most-favored nation bound rates under the World Trade Organization, the impact would be negative on real gross domestic product. Heavy manufactures followed by light manufactures, electronics, and textiles are most impacted. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Asian Development Bank | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo | |
dc.title | Trade Structure and the Transmission of Economic Distress in the High-Income OECD Countries to Developing Asia | |
dc.type | Working Papers | |
dc.subject.expert | Trade Facilitation | |
dc.subject.expert | Trade | |
dc.subject.expert | Economic integration | |
dc.subject.expert | Regional Economic Integration | |
dc.subject.expert | Free Trade | |
dc.subject.expert | Trade Agreements | |
dc.subject.expert | Trade Policy | |
dc.subject.expert | Economic Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Economics | |
dc.subject.expert | International Economics | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic planning | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic structure | |
dc.subject.adb | Growth policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade relations | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic development | |
dc.subject.natural | Regional economics | |
dc.subject.natural | Economic forecasting | |
dc.subject.natural | Economic development projects | |
dc.subject.natural | Success in business | |
dc.subject.natural | Business | |
dc.subject.natural | Free trade | |
dc.subject.natural | Business | |
dc.subject.natural | Economics | |
dc.title.series | ADB economics working paper series | |
dc.title.volume | No. 161 | |
dc.contributor.imprint | Asian Development Bank | |
oar.theme | Trade | |
oar.theme | Economics | |
oar.theme | Labor Migration | |
oar.adminregion | Asia and the Pacific Region | |
oar.country | Bangladesh | |
oar.country | Bhutan | |
oar.country | India | |
oar.country | Maldives | |
oar.country | Nepal | |
oar.country | Sri Lanka | |
oar.country | Brunei Darussalam | |
oar.country | Cambodia | |
oar.country | Indonesia | |
oar.country | Lao People's Democratic Republic | |
oar.country | Malaysia | |
oar.country | Myanmar | |
oar.country | Philippines | |
oar.country | Singapore | |
oar.country | Thailand | |
oar.country | Viet Nam | |
oar.country | Cook Islands | |
oar.country | Fiji | |
oar.country | Kiribati | |
oar.country | Marshall Islands | |
oar.country | Micronesia, Federated States of | |
oar.country | Nauru | |
oar.country | Palau | |
oar.country | Papua New Guinea | |
oar.country | Samoa | |
oar.country | Solomon Islands | |
oar.country | Timor-Leste | |
oar.country | Tonga | |
oar.country | Tuvalu | |
oar.country | Vanuatu | |
oar.country | Afghanistan | |
oar.country | Armenia | |
oar.country | Azerbaijan | |
oar.country | Georgia | |
oar.country | Kazakhstan | |
oar.country | Kyrgyz Republic | |
oar.country | Pakistan | |
oar.country | Tajikistan | |
oar.country | Turkmenistan | |
oar.country | Uzbekistan | |
oar.country | China, People's Republic of | |
oar.country | Hong Kong, China | |
oar.country | Republic of Korea | |
oar.country | Mongolia | |
oar.country | Taipei,China | |
oar.identifier | OAR-001808 | |
oar.author | Jongwanich, Juthathip | |
oar.author | James, William E. | |
oar.author | Minor, Peter J. | |
oar.author | Greenbaum, Alexander | |
oar.import | true | |
oar.googlescholar.linkpresent | true |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
ADB Economics Working Paper Series
ADB Economics Working Paper Series