Pitfalls for ASEAN in Negotiating a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea
Ha, Hoang Thi | July 2019
Abstract
Over the past two decades, developing a code of conduct (COC) for the parties in the South China Sea (SCS) appears to be the end-goal of the longstanding ASEAN-China discourse on the SCS. It was the original objective of ASEAN’s engagement with China on the SCS in the late 1990s, which led to the signing of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) in 2002. After the decade-long impasse regarding the DOC implementation guidelines was cleared in 2011, ASEAN member states and China embarked on official consultations on the COC in September 2013. From 2013 to 2016, the consultations only focused on accumulating commonalities and discussing procedural matters. Beginning from mid-2017, China shifted gear and adopted a more forward-leaning approach towards the COC, encouraged by the Philippines’ decision under the Duterte administration to play down the 2016 arbitration ruling and ASEAN’s meek response to the ruling itself. This paved the way for the adoption of the Framework of the COC in August 2017 and the Single Draft Negotiating Text (SDNT) in June 2018. This article examines some potential pitfalls for ASEAN in the COC negotiations, and argues that the diplomatic progress in the COC process should not distract and divert ASEAN’s attention from the continuing problems at sea.
Citation
Ha, Hoang Thi. 2019. Pitfalls for ASEAN in Negotiating a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea. © ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/11007.ISSN
2335-6677
Keywords
Governance
Good Governance
Governance Approach
Governance Capacity
Governance Models
Governance Quality
Regional Policy
Regional Perspectives
Regional Government
Regional Development
Regional Cooperation
Interregional Cooperation
Business Management
Institutional
Framework
Business Ethics
Regional Plans
Project finance
Development Bank
Common Markets
Bureaucracy
Cabinet system
Common good
Executive power
Government
Separation of powers
Transparency in government
Regional economics
Community development
Show allCollapse