Show simple item record

Why services won’t always buy legitimacy: Everyday experiences of the state in Swat, Pakistan

dc.contributor.authorAoife McCullough
dc.contributor.authorShehryar Toru
dc.contributor.authorRubab Syed
dc.contributor.authorShujaat Ahmed
dc.description.abstractIn 2017, the Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium (SLRC) published a set of unexpected findings. Between 2012 and 2015, services improved in Swat and Lower Dir districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, but this improvement in services did not change people’s opinion of the government. The findings were based on a longitudinal survey that was carried out in 2012 and 2015. Among other questions, respondents were asked about their access to basic services such as health education and health, their satisfaction with those services and their perceptions of government. These findings raised questions about key assumptions informing international development programmes in post conflict contexts, namely that if people’s satisfaction with services improved, this would repair state/society relations and strengthen state legitimacy. The survey asked people about their perception of government, not about their perception of state legitimacy. While the authors argued that perceptions of government were a stepping stone to understanding perceptions of state legitimacy (Nixon and Mallett, 2017), measuring perceptions of government is only one slice of the overall perception of state. It is quite possible for citizens to consider a particular government illegitimate while believing that the state is legitimate. This present research seeks to examine experiences of the state more broadly. Using qualitative research, we explored whether there is a role for services to play in the construction of state legitimacy in Swat, Pakistan.
dc.publisherSustainable Development Policy Institute
dc.titleWhy services won’t always buy legitimacy: Everyday experiences of the state in Swat, Pakistan
dc.typeWorking Papers
dc.subject.expertGood Governance
dc.subject.expertPolitical Leadership
dc.subject.expertPublic Administration
dc.subject.expertBusiness Ethics
dc.subject.expertCorporate Governance Reform
dc.subject.expertGovernance Approach
dc.subject.expertGovernance Quality
dc.subject.expertPublic Sector Projects
dc.subject.expertPublic Sector Reform
dc.subject.expertPolitical Leadership
dc.subject.expertPolitical Power
dc.subject.expertInstitutional Framework
dc.subject.expertGovernment accounting
dc.subject.adbInstitutional Framework
dc.subject.adbPublic Administration
dc.subject.adbBusiness Ethics
dc.subject.adbPolitical Leadership
dc.subject.adbPublic enterprises
dc.subject.adbPublic finance
dc.subject.adbPublic enterprises
dc.subject.naturalCabinet system
dc.subject.naturalCommon good
dc.subject.naturalExecutive power
dc.subject.naturalPolitical obligation
dc.subject.naturalPublic management
dc.subject.naturalGovernment accountability
dc.subject.naturalTransparency in government
dc.subject.naturalPolitical ethics
dc.subject.naturalGovernment spending policy
dc.subject.naturalGovernment services
dc.subject.naturalLocal government
dc.subject.naturalGovernment business enterprises
dc.subject.naturalPolice power
dc.title.seriesSDPI Working Papers
dc.title.volumeNo. 82
dc.contributor.imprintSustainable Development Policy Institute
oar.themePublic Sector
oar.adminregionCentral West Asia Region
oar.authorMcCullough, Aoife
oar.authorToru, Shehryar
oar.authorSyed, Rubab
oar.authorAhmed, Shujaat

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record