Economic Impact of Removing Energy Subsidies in Malaysia
Kimura, Shigeru | October 2016
Abstract
The petroleum subsidy alone was over RM20 billion, which corresponds to around 10 percent of the total government expenditure. Malaysia’s fiscal deficit was 4.5 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2012, and the government aims to reduce it to 3 percent by 2015 and to 0 percent by 2020. The country has already started implementing policies to phase out the fuel subsidies. In December 2014, the government of Malaysia officially removed subsidy for fuels and introduced the “managed float system.” The Special Industrial Tariff for electricity will also be abolished by 2020. If the subsidy in natural gas being sold to electricity companies is removed, electricity price could increase to almost double. However, the Automatic Price Mechanism on transport fuel, such as gasoline, has shifted to the flotation method per 1 December 2014. Currently, the retail price of gasoline and diesel are influenced by market price. Consequently, the price hike in transport fuel after the removal of energy subsidies turned out to be overestimated.
According to this study using the 2010 Malaysian Input-Output (I-O) Table, any increase prices in electricity and transport fuel leads to a serious price impacts to other sectors in Malaysia. Looking at other price changes historically, the rise of Production Price Index in Malaysia, such as wholesale price index and consumer price index was around 9 percent and 4.9 percent, respectively, from 2000 to 2012. When compared to these numbers, the price impact of a subsidy removal ranges from 5 percent to 6 percent is considered significant and hence mitigation measures such as phasing out subsidies particularly for the highly impacted sectors are increasingly important. Electricity price hikes largely affect the hotel and restaurant sector relative to other sectors. On the other hand, a transport fuel price hike affects several sectors widely.
Our study shows the overall effects of subsidy removal and accordingly we propose two options on the usage of the subsidy budget. First, the Malaysian government can use its energy subsidy budget to reduce the fiscal deficit. This option can lower GDP (1.5 percent lower compared with the reference case), with deficit improvement of 0.9 percentage.
Citation
Kimura, Shigeru. 2016. Economic Impact of Removing Energy Subsidies in Malaysia. © Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/10343.Keywords
Household Energy Consumption
Industrial Energy Consumption
Results-Based Monitoring And Evaluation
Evaluation Techniques
Evaluation Studies
Evaluation Methods
Commercial Energy
Urban Development Finance
Trade Finance
Small Business Finance
Rural Finance
Roundtable on International Trade and Finance
Regional Development Finance
Public Service Finance
Public Finance
Project Finance
Private Finance
Nonbank Financing
Non-Bank Financial Institutions
Municipal Finance
Local Government Finance
Local Currency Financing
Limited Resource Financing
International Financial Institutions
Infrastructure Financing
Industrial Finance
Government Financial Institutions
Government Finance
Financing of Infrastructure
Financial Sector Development
Financial Regulation
Domestic Energy
Energy Demand
Energy Prices
Energy Pricing Policy
Energy Supply
Primary Energy Supply
Development Indicators
Social Participation
Low Income Groups
Income Generation
Newly Industrializing Countries
Taxation
Public Accounting
National Budget
Municipal Bonds
Local Government
Local Taxes
International Monetary Relations
International Financial Market
International Banking
Central Banks
Business Financing
Capital Resources
Budgetary Policy
Capital Needs
Corporate Divestiture
Capital Instruments
Pension Funds
Insurance Companies
Banks
Portfolio Management
Fiscal Administration
Economics of Education
Development Banks
Subsidy
Solar battery
Renewable energy resource
Green Energy
Power resource
Electric power
Energy development
Renewable energy resource
Energy assistance
Energy tax credit
Electric power consumption
Cost effectiveness
Supply and demand
Prices
Energy resource
Energy consumption
Price Indexes
Infrastructure
Use tax
Taxing power
State of taxation
Tax-sales
Tax revenue estimating
Tax planning
Spendings tax
Special assessments
Tax administration and procedure
Sales tax
Real property and taxation
Progressive taxation
Effect of taxation on land use
Effect of taxation on labor supply
Intergovernmental tax relations
Inheritance and transfer tax
Energy tax
Show allCollapse