Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    13,000+ curated items from top Think Tanks.
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    Final Round Satisfaction Survey of Higher Education Quality Enhancement Project (HEQEP)

    Mahmud, Minhaj; Mozumder, Golam Nabi; Shahana, Siban; Islam, Shahidul | September 2018
    Abstract
    This study adopts both quantitative and qualitative research techniques to evaluate stakeholders’ satisfaction towards academic and learning environment in a sample of universities in Bangladesh particularly to understand the impact of AIF on the former.. The departments were selected keeping representation of all three types of ranking of the universities (A, B, C), public and private universities (total 90 departments from 22 universities) spreading across 8 administrative divisions of the country. The non-AIF departments are chosen to resemble the treatment departments in terms of similarities of the subject content. However, it is not unlikely that students experience different facilities and environments across departments within the same university.. In total, 2,116 AIF department students and 987 non-AIF department students were interviewed, which is 22 percent deviation from the target sample size. The respondents were asked to rank their level of satisfaction towards various key issues related to teaching, learning, use of teaching input, technology provision, resource use on a five-point Likert scale from unsatisfied to highly satisfied. Next, we focused on the perception and satisfaction of faculty members about the academic environment in their departments. They are the recipients as well as managers of AIF sub-projects (AIF departments). We interviewed 364 faculty members, of which 253 are from the AIF departments/institutes and 111 from the non-AIF departments.
    Citation
    Mahmud, Minhaj; Mozumder, Golam Nabi; Shahana, Siban; Islam, Shahidul. 2018. Final Round Satisfaction Survey of Higher Education Quality Enhancement Project (HEQEP). © Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/9679.
    Keywords
    Examinations
    Higher education institutions
    Free education
    Educational policy
    Project finance
    Technology assessment
    Resources evaluation
    Aid evaluation
    Economic evaluation
    Cost benefit analysis
    Public Education
    Parent Education
    Equity In Education
    Educational Policies
    Educational Reforms
    Quality Education
    Quality Education
    Levels Of Education
    Higher Education Costs
    Educational Testing
    Educational Surveys
    Educational Reforms
    Results-Based Monitoring And Evaluation
    Public Policy Evaluation
    Program Evaluation
    Evaluation Criteria
    Objective tests
    Educational tests and measurements
    College preparation programs
    College dropouts
    Discrimination in higher education
    Universities and colleges
    Educational accountability
    Scholarships
    Prediction of dropout behavior
    Scholarships
    Results mapping
    Self-evaluation
    Participatory monitoring and evaluation
    Educational evaluation
    Cost effectiveness
    Show allCollapse
    Citable URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11540/9679
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Thumbnail
    HEQEP_FRSSFinalReportforWebsite.pdf (363.2Kb)
    Author
    Mahmud, Minhaj
    Mozumder, Golam Nabi
    Shahana, Siban
    Islam, Shahidul
    Theme
    Education
    Evaluation
     
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise