Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    13,800+ curated items from top Think Tanks.
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    Are Five-Year Development Plans Passé in Malaysia?

    Cassey Lee | March 2018
    Abstract
    Since July 2017 bureaucrats in Malaysia’s Economic Planning Unit have been busy preparing the mid-term review report assessing the progress achieved in country’s latest five-year development plan, the Eleventh Malaysia Plan 2016-2020 (11MP).1 The five-year development plan is part of an unbroken tradition that dates back to colonial times. In total, fourteen five-year plans have been published since the early 1950s. Over the years, the orientations of these plans have evolved in response to changes in economic structure, policy goals, resource constraints and external shocks. In more recent years, the structure and contents of five-year plans such as the Tenth Malaysian Plan 2000-2015 (10MP) and the 11MP have been altered in significant ways. In particular, there is less emphasis on the presentation of detailed sectoral allocations for development expenditures. Instead, both the 10MP and 11MP were mainly concerned with proposing broad policy goals. In light of such changes, it is pertinent to ask whether the five-year development plan is still relevant as a tool for economic policy-making for Malaysia? This is not an unusual question to ask, given that many countries such as South Korea and India have already abandoned the use of five-year development plans. This essay seeks to answer the question whether Malaysian policymakers should continue to draft five-year development plans in the future. We begin by discussing the basic nature of five-year development plans.
    Citation
    Cassey Lee. 2018. Are Five-Year Development Plans Passé in Malaysia?. © ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/8047.
    ISSN
    2335-6677
    Keywords
    Civil Society Development
    Agricultural And Rural Development
    Development In East Asia
    Infrastructure Development Projects
    Institutional Development
    Millennium Development Goals
    Policy Development
    Social Development Programs
    Social Development
    Rural planning
    Aid coordination
    Industrial projects
    Infrastructure projects
    Natural resources policy
    Educational development
    Civil government
    Common good
    Federal government
    Delivery of government services
    Government missions
    Social participation
    Political participation
    Community banks
    Business planning
    Infrastructure
    Sustainable urban development
    Social contract
    Show allCollapse
    Citable URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11540/8047
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Thumbnail
    ISEAS_Perspective_2018_13-50.pdf (553.9Kb)
    Author
    Cassey Lee
    Theme
    Development
    Governance
     
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise