The Risks for ASEAN of New Mega-Agreements that Promote the Wrong Model of e-Commerce
dc.contributor.author | Jane Kelsey | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-29T19:13:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-29T19:13:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-10-30 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11540/7662 | |
dc.description.abstract | Digital technology offers exciting new opportunities and advances for ASEAN member states, individually and as a region. The benefits have so far been captured by first movers, especially in the United States. ASEAN countries need time and flexibility to develop their own digital industrialization strategies that can harness the potential gains and minimize the risks, and regulate accordingly. This paper explains how that opportunity would be foreclosed by a new normative framework on electronic commerce and cross-border services that is being systematically advanced by developed countries on behalf of their globally dominant digital industries. Starting with the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, the template is being promoted through a network of mega-regional trade and investment agreements, including the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and potentially the World Trade Organization. Instead of delivering a digital dividend to ASEAN countries, this model of e-commerce could impede their development, create negative fiscal and employment consequences, and leave them dependent on an oligopoly of private corporations that control the global digital infrastructure and mass data. ASEAN member states will need to resist those proposals if they are to maintain their regulatory sovereignty and the policy space to capitalize on the 21st century digital revolution. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia | |
dc.title | The Risks for ASEAN of New Mega-Agreements that Promote the Wrong Model of e-Commerce | |
dc.type | Discussion Paper | |
dc.subject.expert | Trade And Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Large Scale Industry | |
dc.subject.expert | Regional Trade | |
dc.subject.expert | Commerce and Industry | |
dc.subject.expert | Trade Negotiations | |
dc.subject.expert | Merchandise Trade | |
dc.subject.expert | Domestic Trade | |
dc.subject.expert | Computer Industry | |
dc.subject.expert | Trade Regulation | |
dc.subject.adb | Telecommunication Companies | |
dc.subject.adb | Rural Rehabilitation | |
dc.subject.adb | Biotechnology | |
dc.subject.adb | Interindustry Trade | |
dc.subject.adb | Industrial Policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Industrial Investment | |
dc.subject.adb | Industrial Development | |
dc.subject.adb | Small Scale Industry | |
dc.subject.adb | Medium Scale Industry | |
dc.subject.adb | Local Industry | |
dc.subject.adb | Transport Infrastructure | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade regulations | |
dc.subject.adb | Telecommunications Industry | |
dc.subject.adb | Computers | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade data interchange | |
dc.subject.adb | Access to markets | |
dc.subject.adb | E-Commerce | |
dc.subject.natural | Rural development | |
dc.subject.natural | Unfair competition | |
dc.subject.natural | Supply and demand | |
dc.subject.natural | Energy policy | |
dc.subject.natural | Developing countries | |
dc.subject.natural | Industrial organizations | |
dc.subject.natural | Creative industries | |
dc.subject.natural | Investment banking | |
dc.subject.natural | Microfinance | |
dc.subject.natural | Financial planning industry | |
dc.subject.natural | Infrastructure | |
dc.subject.natural | Manufactures | |
dc.subject.natural | Business failures | |
dc.subject.natural | Wages and labor productivity | |
dc.subject.natural | Microelectronics industry | |
dc.subject.natural | Electronic industries | |
dc.subject.natural | Digital electronics | |
dc.subject.natural | Microelectronics | |
dc.subject.natural | Electronic commerce | |
dc.subject.natural | Business enterprises | |
dc.subject.natural | Digital | |
dc.title.series | ERIA Discussion Paper Series | |
dc.title.volume | 2017-10 | |
dc.contributor.imprint | Economic Policy and Competitiveness Research Center | |
oar.theme | Industry | |
oar.theme | Trade | |
oar.adminregion | Asia and the Pacific Region | |
oar.country | Bangladesh | |
oar.country | Bhutan | |
oar.country | India | |
oar.country | Maldives | |
oar.country | Nepal | |
oar.country | Sri Lanka | |
oar.country | Brunei Darussalam | |
oar.country | Cambodia | |
oar.country | Indonesia | |
oar.country | Lao People's Democratic | |
oar.country | Malaysia | |
oar.country | Myanmar | |
oar.country | Philippines | |
oar.country | Singapore | |
oar.country | Thailand | |
oar.country | Viet Nam | |
oar.country | Cook Islands | |
oar.country | Fiji Islands | |
oar.country | Kiribati | |
oar.country | Marshall Islands | |
oar.country | Federated States of Micronesia | |
oar.country | Nauru | |
oar.country | Palau | |
oar.country | Papua New Guinea | |
oar.country | Samoa | |
oar.country | Solomon Islands | |
oar.country | Timor-Leste | |
oar.country | Tonga | |
oar.country | Tuvalu | |
oar.country | Vanuatu | |
oar.country | Afghanistan | |
oar.country | Armenia | |
oar.country | Azerbaijan | |
oar.country | Georgia | |
oar.country | Kazakhstan | |
oar.country | Kyrgyz Republic | |
oar.country | Pakistan | |
oar.country | Tajikistan | |
oar.country | Turkmenistan | |
oar.country | Uzbekistan | |
oar.country | People's Republic of China | |
oar.country | Hong Kong | |
oar.country | China | |
oar.country | Republic of Korea | |
oar.country | Mongolia | |
oar.country | Taipei,China | |
oar.identifier | OAR-007263 | |
oar.author | Kelsey, Jane | |
oar.import | TRUE | |
oar.googlescholar.linkpresent | true |