Show simple item record

ADB Perceptions Survey : Multinational Survey of Stakeholders 2009

dc.date.accessioned2016-08-02T14:43:43Z
dc.date.available2016-08-02T14:43:43Z
dc.date.issued2010-05-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11540/6253
dc.description.abstractThe 2009 ADB Perceptions Survey gauges stakeholders' perceptions of ADB's mission to help reduce poverty and contribute to development in Asia and the Pacific. The survey, the second of its kind since 2006, was carried out among 900 opinion leaders in 31 member countries, drawn from a broad cross section of stakeholders in government, media, civil society, academia, the private sector, and development partners. Key findings reveal that stakeholders strongly acknowledge ADB's impact on development. A considerable majority of stakeholders view ADB as a trusted, reliable, and competent organization with excellent knowledge of the region. ADB also received high marks for its work in improving infrastructure and supporting regional economic cooperation and integration. At the same time, stakeholders believe that ADB could improve its performance in the areas of bureaucracy, speed, and project execution and monitoring, while doing more to strengthen governance and gender equality.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAsian Development Bank
dc.titleADB Perceptions Survey : Multinational Survey of Stakeholders 2009
dc.typeReports
dc.subject.expertResults-Based Monitoring And Evaluation
dc.subject.expertProject Evaluation & Review Technique
dc.subject.expertProject Evaluation
dc.subject.expertProgram Evaluation
dc.subject.expertPerformance Evaluation
dc.subject.expertOperations Evaluation
dc.subject.expertEvaluation Methods
dc.subject.expertEvaluation
dc.subject.adbProject impact
dc.subject.adbDevelopment projects
dc.subject.adbProgram management
dc.subject.adbPerformance appraisal
dc.subject.adbProject appraisal
dc.subject.adbTechnology assessment
dc.subject.naturalCumulative effects assessment
dc.subject.naturalGrievance procedures
dc.subject.naturalParticipatory monitoring and evaluation
dc.contributor.imprintAsian Development Bank
oar.themeEvaluation
oar.adminregionAsia and the Pacific Region
oar.countryBangladesh
oar.countryBhutan
oar.countryIndia
oar.countryMaldives
oar.countryNepal
oar.countrySri Lanka
oar.countryBrunei Darussalam
oar.countryCambodia
oar.countryIndonesia
oar.countryLao People's Democratic
oar.countryMalaysia
oar.countryMyanmar
oar.countryPhilippines
oar.countrySingapore
oar.countryThailand
oar.countryViet Nam
oar.countryCook Islands
oar.countryFiji Islands
oar.countryKiribati
oar.countryMarshall Islands
oar.countryFederated States of Micronesia
oar.countryNauru
oar.countryPalau
oar.countryPapua New Guinea
oar.countrySamoa
oar.countrySolomon Islands
oar.countryTimor-Leste
oar.countryTonga
oar.countryTuvalu
oar.countryVanuatu
oar.countryAfghanistan
oar.countryArmenia
oar.countryAzerbaijan
oar.countryGeorgia
oar.countryKazakhstan
oar.countryKyrgyz Republic
oar.countryPakistan
oar.countryTajikistan
oar.countryTurkmenistan
oar.countryUzbekistan
oar.countryPeople's Republic of China
oar.countryHong Kong
oar.countryChina
oar.countryRepublic of Korea
oar.countryMongolia
oar.countryTaipei,China
dc.identifier.printisbn978-929-092-005-2
oar.identifierOAR-005935
oar.authorAsian Development Bank
oar.importTRUE
oar.googlescholar.linkpresenttrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • More Reports
    Other reports published by the Asian Development Bank

Show simple item record