Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    13,800+ curated items from top Think Tanks.
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    Economic impacts of climate change on water resources in the coterminous United States

    Henderson, James; Rodgers, Charles; Jones, Russell; Smith, Joel; Strzepek, Kenneth; Martinich, Jeremy | January 2015
    Abstract
    A national-scale simulation-optimization model was created to generate estimates of economic impacts associated with changes in water supply and demand as influenced by climate change. Water balances were modeled for the 99 assessment sub-regions, and are presented for 18 water resource regions in the United States. Benefit functions are developed for irrigated agriculture, municipal and domestic water use, commercial and industrial water use, and hydroelectric power generation. Environmental flows below minimal levels required for environmental needs are assessed a penalty. As a demonstration of concept for the model, future climate is projected using a climate model ensemble for two greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenarios: a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario in which no new GHG controls are implemented, and an exemplary mitigation policy (POL) scenario in which future GHG emissions are mitigated. Damages are projected to grow less during the 21st century under the POL scenario than the BAU scenario. The largest impacts from climate change are projected to be on non-consumptive uses (e.g., environmental flows and hydropower) and relatively lower-valued consumptive uses (e.g., agriculture), as water is reallocated during reduced water availability conditions to supply domestic, commercial, and industrial uses with higher marginal values. Lower GHG concentrations associated with a mitigation policy will result in a smaller rise in temperature and thus less extensive damage to some water resource uses. However, hydropower, environmental flow penalty, and agriculture were shown to be sensitive to the change in runoff as well.
    Citation
    Henderson, James; Rodgers, Charles; Jones, Russell; Smith, Joel; Strzepek, Kenneth; Martinich, Jeremy. 2015. Economic impacts of climate change on water resources in the coterminous United States. © Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/4298.
    Print ISBN
    Rodgers, Charles
    ISSN
    1381-2386
    Keywords
    Development
    Infrastructure Development
    Skills Development
    Water
    Water Resources
    Water Resources Management
    Watershed
    Watershed Management
    Watersheds
    ADB
    Development assistance
    Infrastructure projects
    Sustainable growth
    Energy
    Infrastructure projects
    Sustainable growth
    Energy
    Infrastructure
    Partnership
    Mill
    Water
    Watershed restoration
    Experimental watershed areas
    Mountain watersheds
    Urban watersheds
    Show allCollapse
    Citable URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11540/4298
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Thumbnail
    Author
    Henderson, James
    Rodgers, Charles
    Jones, Russell
    Smith, Joel
    Strzepek, Kenneth
    Martinich, Jeremy
    Theme
    Development
    Water
     
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise