Round-Tripping Foreign Direct Investment in the People's Republic of China: Scale, Causes and Implications
dc.contributor.author | Xiao Geng | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-29T14:28:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-29T14:28:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-06-30 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1882-6717 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11540/4054 | |
dc.description.abstract | There is no doubt that part of foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) FDI belongs to the return of Chinese capital that has gone abroad. The World Bank and others have estimated that the scale of this round tripping could be as high as a quarter of the total FDI inflows into the PRC. The prevailing view in much of East and South East Asia is that the PRC has attracted too much of global FDI at the cost of other developing economies. The estimations here indicate that the round-tripping FDI in the PRC is likely to be in the range of 30% to 50% of officially recorded flows, which implies that such concerns are greatly exaggerated. A large part of the capital originally created in PRC has gone abroad and has stayed abroad waiting for opportunities to return to the PRC. The pattern of capital creation and movement suggests that competition for FDI flows is not a zero-sum game. FDI inflows are not simply a fixed sum to be competed away among different countries. Instead, the PRC’s experience shows that FDI inflows are endogenously determined by the capacity of the host countries to create new capital. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Asian Development Bank | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.title | Round-Tripping Foreign Direct Investment in the People's Republic of China: Scale, Causes and Implications | |
dc.type | Briefs | |
dc.subject.expert | Development Economics | |
dc.subject.expert | Regional Economic Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Economic Impact | |
dc.subject.expert | Asian Development Bank | |
dc.subject.expert | Development | |
dc.subject.expert | Economic Boom | |
dc.subject.expert | Regional Economic Integration | |
dc.subject.expert | Good Governance | |
dc.subject.expert | Governance Approach | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic planning | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic structure | |
dc.subject.adb | Growth policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade relations | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic development | |
dc.subject.adb | Economies in transition | |
dc.subject.adb | International economy | |
dc.subject.adb | Border integration | |
dc.subject.adb | Economic integration | |
dc.subject.adb | Gross domestic product | |
dc.subject.adb | Trade policy | |
dc.subject.adb | Institutional Framework | |
dc.subject.adb | Public Administration | |
dc.subject.adb | Business Ethics | |
dc.subject.natural | Regional economics | |
dc.subject.natural | Economic forecasting | |
dc.subject.natural | Economic development projects | |
dc.subject.natural | Success in business | |
dc.subject.natural | Business | |
dc.subject.natural | Free trade | |
dc.subject.natural | Business | |
dc.subject.natural | Economics | |
dc.subject.natural | Communication in economic development | |
dc.subject.natural | Restraint of trade | |
dc.subject.natural | International economic integration | |
dc.subject.natural | Trade blocs | |
dc.subject.natural | East-West trade | |
dc.title.series | Research Policy Brief | |
dc.title.volume | 10 | |
dc.contributor.imprint | Asian Development Bank | |
oar.theme | Economics | |
oar.theme | Governance | |
oar.adminregion | East Asia Region | |
oar.country | People's Republic of China | |
oar.country | Hong Kong | |
oar.country | China | |
oar.country | Republic of Korea | |
oar.country | Mongolia | |
oar.country | Taipei,China | |
oar.identifier | OAR-004724 | |
oar.author | Geng, Xiao | |
oar.import | true | |
oar.googlescholar.linkpresent | true |