Global Financial and Economic Crisis: Implications for Trade and Industrial Restructuring in South Asia
De, Prabir; Neogi, Chiranjib | July 2011
This study investigates the impact of global crisis shocks on India’s trade and industry. We use both panel data modeling and vector autoregression techniques to understand the dynamic effects of global crisis shocks on Indian industry and trade. The estimated results of panel data models show that changes in trade composition are positively associated with changes in manufacturing composition in India, controlling for other variables. However, there is no strong indication that Indian industry has been severely harmed by the fall in demand in crisis-affected advanced economies such as the United States (US), the European Union (EU), and Japan, holding other things constant. Since there may be lags between changes in composition in export and industry, the study then explores the dynamic effects of global crisis shocks on Indian industry and trade with the help of vector autoregression techniques. The findings of the study indicate that the compositional change in industry has responded significantly to exports to the US, Japan, and the EU in the crisis period. Variance decomposition of compositional change in industry reveals that during the pre-crisis period, almost 100% of the variation in compositional change in industry depended on its own variation, while in the crisis period about 20% of the variation in compositional change in industry has depended on the exports to the EU, Japan, and the US. Therefore, the effect of global crisis shocks of India’s exports to advanced economies during the crisis period has been transmitted to Indian industry. However, Indian industry has not responded significantly to the shocks of imports from the advanced economies, while the response to its own shocks is significant during both pre- and postcrisis periods. The study also indicates that India’s trade openness has responded mildly to the shock of exports to the US. India’s trade with the US, coupled with US GDP, has significantly contributed to the variability of India’s trade openness in the crisis period, accounting for 40% of the variation of the tradeGDP ratio of India, whereas India’s trade with the EU and Japan has had either no effect or very insignificant effect on India’s trade openness. This study suggests that Indian industry has not been significantly harmed by the ongoing global crisis. Even though India continues to enjoy relatively large domestic demand, the compositional change (positive) in the manufacturing sector would decrease if the crisis continues, resulting in a slowdown in growth and a rise in stagnation.
CitationDe, Prabir; Neogi, Chiranjib. 2011. Global Financial and Economic Crisis: Implications for Trade and Industrial Restructuring in South Asia. © Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/3882. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Regional Economic Development
Gross domestic product
Labor turnoverShow allCollapse
MetadataShow full item record
Users also downloaded
Asian Development Bank (Asian Development Bank, 2004-04-01)The 2003 Annual Report of the Board of Directors to the Board of Governors reviews ADB's operations, projects, internal administration, financial management, and funding. The report also contains chapters on regional highlights, economic developments, and a special section on law and institutional reform. The report includes the complete financial statements, a statistical annex, and appendixes.The 2003 Annual Report of the Board of Directors to the Board of Governors reviews ADB's operations, projects, internal administration, financial management, and funding. The report also contains chapters on regional highlights, economic developments, ...