Pilot Financing Instruments and Modalities: Proposed Extension of Pilot Period for the Project Design Facility with Modifications
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-10T10:15:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-10T10:15:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11540/3503 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper seeks the approval of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Board of Directors to extend the pilot period of the project design facility (PDF), with modifications, until 31 December 2017. In 2011, the Board approved the PDF on a pilot basis for an initial period from 12 April 2011 to 31 December 2013. The PDF was established with a commitment authority of $150 million.1 A review of the PDF indicates that the PDF could offer a useful complement to other ADB financing modalities but that implementation issues impede its greater use. This paper therefore proposes to extend the pilot period of the PDF with a few modifications to address these issues. Before the extended pilot phase expires, ADB Management will report to the Board on the results achieved, and propose whether the PDF should be mainstreamed, further revised, or discontinued. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Asian Development Bank | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo | |
dc.title | Pilot Financing Instruments and Modalities: Proposed Extension of Pilot Period for the Project Design Facility with Modifications | |
dc.type | Institutional Materials | |
dc.subject.expert | Results-Based Monitoring And Evaluation | |
dc.subject.expert | Project Evaluation & Review Technique | |
dc.subject.expert | Project Evaluation | |
dc.subject.expert | Program Evaluation | |
dc.subject.expert | Performance Evaluation | |
dc.subject.expert | Operations Evaluation | |
dc.subject.expert | Evaluation Methods | |
dc.subject.expert | Evaluation | |
dc.subject.adb | Project impact | |
dc.subject.adb | Development projects | |
dc.subject.adb | Program management | |
dc.subject.adb | Performance appraisal | |
dc.subject.adb | Project appraisal | |
dc.subject.adb | Technology assessment | |
dc.subject.natural | Cumulative effects assessment | |
dc.subject.natural | Grievance procedures | |
dc.subject.natural | Participatory monitoring and evaluation | |
dc.contributor.imprint | Asian Development Bank | |
oar.theme | Evaluation | |
oar.adminregion | Asia and the Pacific Region | |
oar.country | Bangladesh | |
oar.country | Bhutan | |
oar.country | India | |
oar.country | Maldives | |
oar.country | Nepal | |
oar.country | Sri Lanka | |
oar.country | Brunei Darussalam | |
oar.country | Cambodia | |
oar.country | Indonesia | |
oar.country | Lao People's Democratic | |
oar.country | Malaysia | |
oar.country | Myanmar | |
oar.country | Philippines | |
oar.country | Singapore | |
oar.country | Thailand | |
oar.country | Viet Nam | |
oar.country | Cook Islands | |
oar.country | Fiji Islands | |
oar.country | Kiribati | |
oar.country | Marshall Islands | |
oar.country | Federated States of Micronesia | |
oar.country | Nauru | |
oar.country | Palau | |
oar.country | Papua New Guinea | |
oar.country | Samoa | |
oar.country | Solomon Islands | |
oar.country | Timor-Leste | |
oar.country | Tonga | |
oar.country | Tuvalu | |
oar.country | Vanuatu | |
oar.country | Afghanistan | |
oar.country | Armenia | |
oar.country | Azerbaijan | |
oar.country | Georgia | |
oar.country | Kazakhstan | |
oar.country | Kyrgyz Republic | |
oar.country | Pakistan | |
oar.country | Tajikistan | |
oar.country | Turkmenistan | |
oar.country | Uzbekistan | |
oar.country | People's Republic of China | |
oar.country | Hong Kong | |
oar.country | China | |
oar.country | Republic of Korea | |
oar.country | Mongolia | |
oar.country | Taipei,China | |
oar.identifier | OAR-003739 | |
oar.author | Asian Development Bank | |
oar.import | true | |
oar.googlescholar.linkpresent | true |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Institutional Materials
Institutional materials are ADB-centric publications and similar materials from other institutions that have elements of being scholarly. Institutional materials may consist of administrative documents, strategy or policy notes and reviews, conference proceedings, operational reports, or project notes that may be of value to researchers and academics. It is possible that these materials may not serve as the primary resource for research work, but they may point researchers to the right direction and give supplemental data.