Public Investment Criteria: Economic Internal Rate of Return and Equalizing Discount Rate
Ali, Ifzal | November 1986
Abstract
The economic analysis of a project is aimed at determining whether the project is consistent with the overall national and sectpral objectives and whether the investment proposed represents the best means of achieving the intended objectives. The process of economic analysis can be seen as a sequence of actions. First, it is necessary to identify the need or demand for the project. The second step is to establish whether the proposed project provides the least cost or the most cost-effective way of attaining the objectives of the project. Having identified the project's costs and benefits and carefully quantified them, the third step is to ascertain whether the net benefits expected from the resources allocated to the project would be in excess of, or at least equal to, the net benefits to the economy that could be expected if these resources were made available for the best alternative project. These three steps are distinct but interrelated.
The literature on public investment criteria has focussed attention on the third step whereby the net discounted present value and economic internal rate of return (EIRR) have emerged as the main criteria for judging the economic viability of a project. The purpose of this paper is to focus attention on the second step in which· the least-cost solution is determined. Apart from highlighting the is!sues involved in deriving the least-cost solution, some insights about the linkages of the three steps in the process of economic analysis of projects will emerge.
The standard literature on the theory of the firm will be used to provide the analytical backbone of this paper. Starting frc>m a simple static one-period model, we will move to a static multi-pe,riod framework which will provide the basis for the discussion of investment criteria that is to follow. In sections II and III the emphasis has been to clearly distinguish profit maximization from least-,cost solutions, thereby providing the rationale for the distinction between EIRR and the equalizing discount rate (EDR). While the model described in section III is rarely used in determining the least-cost solution among project alternatives, its usefulness lies in allowing a rigorous examination of the issues involved. It provides the linkage between the three steps described above in the economic analysis of projects. A numerical example is given in order to clarify the issues involved.
Citation
Ali, Ifzal. 1986. Public Investment Criteria: Economic Internal Rate of Return and Equalizing Discount Rate. © Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/3092. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.Keywords
Macroeconomic
Macroeconomic Analysis
Macroeconomic Framework
Macroeconomic Models
Macroeconomic Performance
Macroeconomic Planning
Macroeconomic Policies
Macroeconomic Reform
Macroeconomic Stabilization
Social condition
Economic dependence
Economic assistance
International monetary relations
International monetary relations
International trade
National accounting
Market
Exchange
Comparative economics
Index number
Monetary policy
Value analysis
Adjustment cost
Transaction cost
Conditionality
International relations
Show allCollapse
Citable URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11540/3092Metadata
Show full item recordUsers also downloaded
-
CAREC Transport and Trade Facilitation Strategy 2020
Asian Development Bank (Asian Development Bank, 2013-10-24)The Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Transport and Trade Facilitation Strategy (TTFS) was refined to account for changes in the CAREC Program since 2008, particularly expanded membership and the new strategic framework (CAREC 2020). The refined strategy also reflects lessons learned during the initial phase of implementation, aiming to more efficiently and comprehensively achieve ...The Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Transport and Trade Facilitation Strategy (TTFS) was refined to account for changes in the CAREC Program since 2008, particularly expanded membership and the new strategic framework (CAREC 2020). ... -
Annual Report 2014: Operational Data
Asian Development Bank (Asian Development Bank, 2015-01-01)The page has additional information for the ADB Annual Report 2014. In 2014, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved $22.93 billion in development assistance, including $13.69 billion financed by ADB’s ordinary capital resources and special funds, and a record $9.24 billion by cofinancing partners. Disbursements totaled $10.01 billion, an increase of $1.47 billion (17%) from 2013, and the first ...The page has additional information for the ADB Annual Report 2014. In 2014, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved $22.93 billion in development assistance, including $13.69 billion financed by ADB’s ordinary capital resources and special funds, ... -
Annual Report 2014: Organizational Information
Asian Development Bank (Asian Development Bank, 2015-01-01)The page has additional information for the ADB Annual Report 2014. In 2014, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved $22.93 billion in development assistance, including $13.69 billion financed by ADB’s ordinary capital resources and special funds, and a record $9.24 billion by cofinancing partners. Disbursements totaled $10.01 billion, an increase of $1.47 billion (17%) from 2013, and the ...The page has additional information for the ADB Annual Report 2014. In 2014, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved $22.93 billion in development assistance, including $13.69 billion financed by ADB’s ordinary capital resources and special ...