Show simple item record

A Review of the Japan Representative Office

dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T12:24:47Z
dc.date.available2015-03-18T12:24:47Z
dc.date.issued1999-08-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11540/2861
dc.description.abstractThe Japanese Representative Office (JRO) was officially inaugurated in November 1996 in Tokyo. As was agreed by the Board of Directors, this information paper reviews JRO’s activities, relative to its approved terms of reference (TOR), during its first two years of operations. The information paper is based on the findings of a working group that studied JRO’s operations and interviewed staff from concerned Bank departments and offices under the guidance of Vice President (Finance and Administration), and the Working Group Mission that visited Japan from 12 to 20 April 1999 to meet with JRO staff and a cross-section of JRO’s constituency. The paper first provides background information on JRO operations, then assesses the operations. The assessment starts with a review of JRO’s cooperation with the Japanese Government, multilateral finance institutions (MFIs) and United Nations (UN) agencies, and non-government organizations (NGOs), following the structure of JRO’s TOR. The assessment also focuses on JRO’s (utility and operational effectiveness for the Bank, and usefulness from the perspective of the major interest groups in Japan. The paper’s fourth section briefly analyzes JRO’s benefits and costs. The last section discusses the future direction of JRO’s operations, with a view to improving JRO’s utility and operational effectiveness.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAsian Development Bank
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo
dc.titleA Review of the Japan Representative Office
dc.typeInstitutional Materials
dc.subject.expertAlleviating Poverty
dc.subject.expertAnti-Poverty
dc.subject.expertExtreme Poverty
dc.subject.expertFight Against Poverty
dc.subject.expertGlobal Poverty
dc.subject.expertHealth Aspects Of Poverty
dc.subject.expertIndicators Of Poverty
dc.subject.expertParticipatory Poverty Assessment
dc.subject.expertPoverty Eradication
dc.subject.expertPoverty Analysis
dc.subject.expertPoverty In Developing Countries
dc.subject.expertPoverty Reduction Efforts
dc.subject.expertUrban Poverty
dc.subject.expertResults-Based Monitoring And Evaluation
dc.subject.expertProject Evaluation & Review Technique
dc.subject.expertPerformance Evaluation
dc.subject.expertImpact Evaluation Reports
dc.subject.expertEvaluation Criteria
dc.subject.adbDevelopment Indicators
dc.subject.adbEnvironmental Indicators
dc.subject.adbEconomic Indicators
dc.subject.adbEducational Indicators
dc.subject.adbDemographic Indicators
dc.subject.adbHealth Indicators
dc.subject.adbDisadvantaged Groups
dc.subject.adbLow Income Groups
dc.subject.adbSocially Disadvantaged Children
dc.subject.adbRural Conditions
dc.subject.adbRural Development
dc.subject.adbSocial Conditions
dc.subject.adbUrban Development
dc.subject.adbUrban Sociology
dc.subject.adbProject finance
dc.subject.adbResources evaluation
dc.subject.adbNeeds assessment
dc.subject.adbCost benefit analysis
dc.subject.naturalPoor
dc.subject.naturalEconomic forecasting
dc.subject.naturalHealth expectancy
dc.subject.naturalSocial groups
dc.subject.naturalPolitical participation
dc.subject.naturalDistribution of income
dc.subject.naturalInequality of income
dc.subject.naturalDeveloping countries
dc.subject.naturalRural community development
dc.subject.naturalMass society
dc.subject.naturalSocial change
dc.subject.naturalSocial policy
dc.subject.naturalSocial stability
dc.subject.naturalPopulation
dc.subject.naturalSustainable development
dc.subject.naturalPeasantry
dc.subject.naturalUrban policy
dc.subject.naturalUrban renewal
dc.subject.naturalResults mapping
dc.subject.naturalRisk assessment
dc.subject.naturalParticipatory monitoring and evaluation
dc.subject.naturalCost effectiveness
dc.contributor.imprintAsian Development Bank
oar.themePoverty
oar.themeEvaluation
oar.adminregionAsia and the Pacific Region
oar.countryBangladesh
oar.countryBhutan
oar.countryIndia
oar.countryMaldives
oar.countryNepal
oar.countrySri Lanka
oar.countryBrunei Darussalam
oar.countryCambodia
oar.countryIndonesia
oar.countryLao People's Democratic
oar.countryMalaysia
oar.countryMyanmar
oar.countryPhilippines
oar.countrySingapore
oar.countryThailand
oar.countryViet Nam
oar.countryCook Islands
oar.countryFiji Islands
oar.countryKiribati
oar.countryMarshall Islands
oar.countryFederated States of Micronesia
oar.countryNauru
oar.countryPalau
oar.countryPapua New Guinea
oar.countrySamoa
oar.countrySolomon Islands
oar.countryTimor-Leste
oar.countryTonga
oar.countryTuvalu
oar.countryVanuatu
oar.countryAfghanistan
oar.countryArmenia
oar.countryAzerbaijan
oar.countryGeorgia
oar.countryKazakhstan
oar.countryKyrgyz Republic
oar.countryPakistan
oar.countryTajikistan
oar.countryTurkmenistan
oar.countryUzbekistan
oar.countryPeople's Republic of China
oar.countryHong Kong
oar.countryChina
oar.countryRepublic of Korea
oar.countryMongolia
oar.countryTaipei,China
oar.identifierOAR-003451
oar.authorAsian Development Bank
oar.importtrue
oar.googlescholar.linkpresenttrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Institutional Materials
    Institutional materials are ADB-centric publications and similar materials from other institutions that have elements of being scholarly. Institutional materials may consist of administrative documents, strategy or policy notes and reviews, conference proceedings, operational reports, or project notes that may be of value to researchers and academics. It is possible that these materials may not serve as the primary resource for research work, but they may point researchers to the right direction and give supplemental data.

Show simple item record

Users also downloaded