Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    13,800+ curated items from top Think Tanks.
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    Priorities of the People Hardship in The Federated States of Micronesia

    Asian Development Bank | September 2004
    Abstract
    H ardship and poverty in the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) have not been viewed as important national concerns until recent trends made them both daily issues at the household level. One of these trends is the poor performance of the economy. From 1995 to 1999 the average growth rate was a negative 3.9% per year. Since 2000 there has been some modest recovery with annual growth averaging 3.6% per year, but there is a growing gap between rich and poor, and increasing numbers of landless or land-poor people. The 1998 Household Income and Expenditure Survey indicates that about 30% of households in the country had incomes below the estimated basic needs poverty line of US$768 per person per year. The highest level of hardship and income poverty was recorded in Chuuk at 32.9%, and Pohnpei at 29.5%. These households were likely to experience some degree of financial hardship on a daily or weekly basis. To better understand the needs and views of those facing hardship in the FSM and develop programs to alleviate it, the government undertook a “Participatory Assessment of Hardship” from late 2003 to early 2004. People from all sectors of society, Thirty percent of households were under the basic needs poverty line People find it difficult to meet their families’ needs2 3 including the poor, were asked to describe poverty and hardship from their point of view and suggest priority actions to address their concerns. Interviews were held at the household level, and focus group discussions and workshops were held with communities and at the national level. Three communities from each of the participating states (Chuuk, Yap, and Pohnpei) were selected for the study to represent both rural and urban areas, and various levels of access to services. A team made up of government and nongovernment representatives consulted with about 350 people throughout the study, which concluded with state-level workshops and a national workshop in Pohnpei to validate the findings. The assessment was funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
    Citation
    Asian Development Bank. 2004. Priorities of the People Hardship in The Federated States of Micronesia. © Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/2423. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
    Keywords
    Alleviating Poverty
    Anti-Poverty
    Extreme Poverty
    Fight Against Poverty
    Global Poverty
    Health Aspects Of Poverty
    Indicators Of Poverty
    Participatory Poverty Assessment
    Poverty Eradication
    Poverty Analysis
    Poverty In Developing Countries
    Poverty Reduction Efforts
    Urban Poverty
    Urbanization
    Urban Services
    Urban Projects
    Urban Problems
    Urban Poverty
    Urban Policy
    Urban Planning
    Urban Infrastructure
    Urban Health
    Urban Government
    Urban Economic Development
    Urban Development Finance
    Urban Development
    Urban Conditions
    Urban Communities
    Urban Population
    Development Indicators
    Environmental Indicators
    Economic Indicators
    Educational Indicators
    Demographic Indicators
    Health Indicators
    Disadvantaged Groups
    Low Income Groups
    Socially Disadvantaged Children
    Rural Conditions
    Rural Development
    Social Conditions
    Urban Development
    Urban Sociology
    Urban Plans
    Urbanism
    Urban agriculture
    Economic Development
    Rural Urban Migration
    Cities
    Poor
    Economic forecasting
    Health expectancy
    Social groups
    Political participation
    Distribution of income
    Inequality of income
    Developing countries
    Rural community development
    Mass society
    Social change
    Social policy
    Social stability
    Population
    Sustainable development
    Peasantry
    Urban policy
    Urban renewal
    Local government
    Urban renewal
    Urban housing
    Urban sociology
    Transit systems
    Rapid transit
    Public transit
    Mass transit
    Show allCollapse
    Citable URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11540/2423
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Thumbnail
    PDF (2.555Mb)
    Author
    Asian Development Bank
    Theme
    Poverty
    Urban
    Labor Migration
     
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise