Critical Review of East Asia - South America Trade
Hamanaka, Shintaro; Tafgar, Aiken | January 2013
Abstract
There is a general consensus that trade between East Asia and South America is becoming increasingly important. However, we know little about the actual dynamic development of this inter-regional trade. This paper examines whether the trend of East Asia–South America trade is a general phenomena or a country- and commodity-specific issue, and whether the increase in trade values has a solid basis in terms of commodity diversification and/or price and quantity effects. While South America has an overall trade surplus with East Asia, detailed country and commodity analysis of inter-regional trade reveal several potential weaknesses in South America’s trade with East Asia. Our research finds that (i) the increase in trade between the two regions can be explained mainly by the increase in the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) trade with South America, (ii) the increase in the PRC’s imports from South America is limited to a few commodities, (iii) the increase in East Asia’s imports from South America is due partly to commodity price increases, and (iv) the PRC has started to export various types of electronics and machinery products to South America. Overall, East Asia’s exports to South America seem to show more promising signs of growth than South America’s exports to East Asia.
Citation
Hamanaka, Shintaro; Tafgar, Aiken. 2013. Critical Review of East Asia - South America Trade. © Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/2337. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.Keywords
Regionalism
Regional Economy
Regional Trading Arrangements
Regional Trade Integration
Regional Economic Integration
Regional Cooperation
Interregional Cooperation
Trade Disputes
Trade Barriers
Economic integration
Regional Development Bank
Preferential tariffs
International negotiation
Protectionist measures
Access to markets
Economic agreements
International trade law
Regional integration
Trade relations
Regional disparities
Interregionalism
Regional economic disparities
Regional economic blocs
Industrial arbitration
Show allCollapse
Citable URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11540/2337Metadata
Show full item recordUsers also downloaded
-
Asia and Global Production Networks—Implications for Trade, Incomes and Economic Vulnerability
Ferrarini, Benno; Hummels, David (Asian Development Bank, 2013-06-30)New measures have opened up insights into the extent and complexity of global production networks. The chapters in this timely book deploy new tools to understand how global value chains change the nature of global economic interdependence, and to assess how that in turn changes our understanding of policies in this new environment. The authors bring to bear a wide variety of methodological tools ...New measures have opened up insights into the extent and complexity of global production networks. The chapters in this timely book deploy new tools to understand how global value chains change the nature of global economic interdependence, and to ... -
Asian Economic Integration Report 2015: How Can Special Economic Zones Catalyze Economic Development?
Asian Development Bank (Asian Development Bank, 2015-12-02)The Asian Economic Integration Report is an annual review of Asia’s regional economic cooperation and integration. It covers the 48 regional members of the Asian Development Bank. This issue includes Special Chapter: How Can Special Economic Zones Catalyze Economic Development?The Asian Economic Integration Report is an annual review of Asia’s regional economic cooperation and integration. It covers the 48 regional members of the Asian Development Bank. This issue includes Special Chapter: How Can Special Economic Zones ... -
The Selection of Trade Integration Indicators: Intraregional Share, Intensity, Homogeneous Intensity, and Introversion Index
Hamanaka, Shintaro (Asian Development Bank, 2015-10-01)Introversion index, rather than intraregional trade share, should be used when comparing the level of trade integration (both cross-regional and time series analyses). Further, since Asia is a group of heterogeneous countries, a subregional level analysis is more appropriate in understanding the nature of its trade integration.Introversion index, rather than intraregional trade share, should be used when comparing the level of trade integration (both cross-regional and time series analyses). Further, since Asia is a group of heterogeneous countries, a subregional level ...