Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    13,800+ curated items from top Think Tanks.
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    Trade Structure and the Transmission of Economic Distress in the High-Income OECD Countries to Developing Asia

    Jongwanich, Juthathip; James, William E.; Minor, Peter J.; Greenbaum, Alexander | May 2009
    Abstract
    This paper examines the structure and direction of developing Asia’s trade over the past two decades. The impacts on developing Asia of the economic slowdown in 2009–2010 in high-income countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which includes the European Union (EU), Japan, and United States (US) are projected through a computable general equilibrium model (CGE) of world trade and production. In addition, the impacts of fiscal stimulus and the rise of protectionist sentiments within developing Asia are examined. The expansion of intraregional trade in Asia reflects the role of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as an assembly point and its reliance on demand from outside the region, the EU and the US in particular. The trade channel is crucial in transmitting economic distress from the OECD countries to developing Asia. The projection shows that developing Asia will continue to suffer from demand decline in OECD countries, with the PRC and India being the most impacted. Though Southeast Asia faces reduced exports to the OECD countries, its exports are reduced significantly to other Asian exporters, demonstrating the indirect trade linkages that now exist in the global economy. Fiscal stimulus from the largest economies (including PRC, EU, Japan, and US) could help boost trade and gross domestic product growth in developing Asia but it is not projected to offset entirely the negative impact from the global economic downturn. Protectionism has a negative impact on the countries and regions that take that course. Southeast Asia would be the most impacted by protectionism. If Southeast Asian countries were to raise their applied tariffs to the maximum most-favored nation bound rates under the World Trade Organization, the impact would be negative on real gross domestic product. Heavy manufactures followed by light manufactures, electronics, and textiles are most impacted.
    Citation
    Jongwanich, Juthathip; James, William E.; Minor, Peter J.; Greenbaum, Alexander. 2009. Trade Structure and the Transmission of Economic Distress in the High-Income OECD Countries to Developing Asia. © Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1812. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
    ISSN
    1655-5252
    Keywords
    Trade Facilitation
    Trade
    Economic integration
    Regional Economic Integration
    Free Trade
    Trade Agreements
    Trade Policy
    Economic Development
    Economics
    International Economics
    Economic planning
    Economic structure
    Growth policy
    Trade relations
    Trade policy
    Trade policy
    Economic development
    Regional economics
    Economic forecasting
    Economic development projects
    Success in business
    Business
    Free trade
    Business
    Economics
    Show allCollapse
    Citable URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1812
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Thumbnail
    PDF (648.0Kb)
    Author
    Jongwanich, Juthathip
    James, William E.
    Minor, Peter J.
    Greenbaum, Alexander
    Theme
    Trade
    Economics
    Labor Migration
     
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise