Show simple item record

Assessing Energy Security in the Caspian Region: The Geopolitical Implications for European Energy Strategy

dc.contributor.authorUlviyye Aydin
dc.contributor.authorDina Azhgaliyeva
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-31T14:16:21Z
dc.date.available2019-12-31T14:16:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11540/11237
dc.description.abstractFollowing the collapse of the Soviet Union, Western countries have signed several agreements regarding the use of hydrocarbon resources in the Caspian Basin, with the aim of diversifying their energy suppliers. However, recession in the world economy and persistently low oil prices have profoundly affected the economies of the Caspian states, whose gross domestic product and exports are dominated by oil and oil products. Strongly dependent on export revenues from oil and gas, the economic growth of these states has slowed since 2014. Although limited energy resources have stimulated an emphasis on security of supply, fundamentally understood as a continued and low-risk strategy of interruption of energy import flows, low oil prices have also maintained focus on the challenge of security of demand faced by energy-producing economies in terms of stable energy export revenues. However, geopolitical developments around the world, especially local armed conflicts, highlight the importance of secure routes, as they present a threat to energy transportation. Using an indicator-based approach and country-level data over the period 2000–2017, this paper assesses the security of demand for the oil and gas of three countries in the Caspian region: Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan, over a 16-year period, capturing the geopolitical situation and contributing to a greater understanding of the impact of energy-transporting countries’ geopolitical situation on energy transportation to the European Union (EU). The results demonstrate that risk of energy security of demand is greater when political risk in energy-transporting countries is included within a measure of energy security of demand, i.e., risky external energy demand. The sharp decline in political stability and absence of violence or terrorism ratings in Ukraine and Turkey has increased the risk of security of energy demand in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan. The results highlight the importance of cooperation not only between the EU and the Caspian region, but also with energy-transporting countries, such as Ukraine, Georgia, and Turkey. Alternatively, routes may be found that bypass countries with low levels of political stability, such as through the Trans-Caspian Pipeline.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAsian Development Bank Institute
dc.titleAssessing Energy Security in the Caspian Region: The Geopolitical Implications for European Energy Strategy
dc.typeWorking Papers
dc.subject.expertEnergy Economics
dc.subject.expertEnergy Technology
dc.subject.expertEnergy Development Finance
dc.subject.expertIntraregional Trade
dc.subject.expertRegional Trade
dc.subject.expertTrade
dc.subject.expertHealth Standards
dc.subject.expertHealth Care Cost Control
dc.subject.expertHealth Care Access
dc.subject.expertWorld Trade Organization
dc.subject.expertTrade Restrictions
dc.subject.expertTrade Negotiations
dc.subject.expertTrade Liberalization
dc.subject.expertTrade Barriers
dc.subject.adbEnergy Demand
dc.subject.adbEnergy Flow
dc.subject.adbEnergy Markets
dc.subject.adbEnergy Prices
dc.subject.adbEnergy Supply
dc.subject.adbRegional development bank
dc.subject.adbTrade development
dc.subject.adbImport volume
dc.subject.adbExport volume
dc.subject.naturalEnergy industry
dc.subject.naturalElectric power
dc.subject.naturalEnergy security
dc.subject.naturalPrice
dc.subject.naturalSupply and demand
dc.subject.naturalRegional trading blocs
dc.subject.naturalForeign trade and employment
dc.subject.naturalDeveloping countries
dc.subject.naturalIndustrial priorities
dc.subject.naturalTechnological innovation
dc.subject.naturalTechnology transfer
dc.subject.naturalForeign trade regulation
dc.subject.naturalIndustrial relations
dc.title.seriesADBI Working Paper Series
dc.title.volumeNo. 1011
dc.contributor.imprintAsian Development Bank Institute
oar.themeEnergy
oar.themeTrade
oar.adminregionAsia and the Pacific Region
oar.countryBangladesh
oar.countryBhutan
oar.countryIndia
oar.countryMaldives
oar.countryNepal
oar.countrySri Lanka
oar.countryBrunei Darussalam
oar.countryCambodia
oar.countryIndonesia
oar.countryLao People's Democratic
oar.countryMalaysia
oar.countryMyanmar
oar.countryPhilippines
oar.countrySingapore
oar.countryThailand
oar.countryViet Nam
oar.countryCook Islands
oar.countryFiji Islands
oar.countryKiribati
oar.countryMarshall Islands
oar.countryFederated States of Micronesia
oar.countryNauru
oar.countryPalau
oar.countryPapua New Guinea
oar.countrySamoa
oar.countrySolomon Islands
oar.countryTimor-Leste
oar.countryTonga
oar.countryTuvalu
oar.countryVanuatu
oar.countryAfghanistan
oar.countryArmenia
oar.countryAzerbaijan
oar.countryGeorgia
oar.countryKazakhstan
oar.countryKyrgyz Republic
oar.countryPakistan
oar.countryTajikistan
oar.countryTurkmenistan
oar.countryUzbekistan
oar.countryPeople's Republic of China
oar.countryHong Kong
oar.countryChina
oar.countryRepublic of Korea
oar.countryMongolia
oar.countryTaipei,China
oar.identifierOAR-010601
oar.authorAydin, Ulviyye
oar.authorAzhgaliyeva, Dina
oar.importTRUE
oar.googlescholar.linkpresenttrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ADBI Working Papers
    The Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series which began in January 2003. The numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI was established in 1997 in Tokyo, Japan, to help build capacity, skills, and knowledge related to poverty reduction and other areas that support long-term growth and competitiveness in developing economies in Asia and the Pacific.

Show simple item record