Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    13,800+ curated items from top Think Tanks.
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Home

    About

    Open Access Repository

    SearchBrowse by ThemeBrowse by AuthorBrowse by TypeMost Popular Titles

    Other Resources

    Curators

    Events

    Contributing Think Tanks

    Networks

    Using Content

    FAQs

    Terms of Use

    Implications of Rising Income Inequality for the Korean Economy

    Han, Minsoo | April 2017
    Abstract
    The recent literature has found that rising income inequality in many countries is harmful for their sustainable growth (Dabla-Norris and others (2015), Easterly (2007), Ostry, Berg, and Tsangarides (2014). In Han, Kim, and Lee (2016), we narrow down the scope and quantitatively study the effect of rising income inequality in China, Japan, Korea, and the U.S. on the Korean economy. To do that, we first relate the empirical proxies corresponding to income inequality to data on consumption, investment, and employment. The proxies are income shares held by the highest 10 percent, the highest 5 percent, the highest 1 percent, the highest 0.1 percent, and the inverted Pareto-Lorenz coefficient from the World Wealth and Income Database (WID). Our regression results show that there might be opposing forces at work in the effect of rising income inequality on consumption, investment, and employment. An increase in either income held by top 10 percent or 0.1 percent tends to have negative effects on consumption, investment, and employment. On the contrary, the income share held by top 1 percent tends to have positive effects. As a result, our predicted effect of an increase in top income shares, arising from rising inequality, on consumption, investment, and employment depends on the combination of the predicted path of top income shares weighted by the estimated coefficients. In addition, the inverted Pareto-Lorenz coefficient, which represents a country's degree of income inequality, does not have any significant effect.
    Citation
    Han, Minsoo. 2017. Implications of Rising Income Inequality for the Korean Economy. © Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/10564.
    Keywords
    Poverty Analysis
    Participatory Poverty Assessment
    Poverty Reduction Strategy
    Extreme Poverty
    Economic development
    Growth And Poverty
    Macroeconomic
    Macroeconomic Analysis
    Macroeconomic Framework
    Macroeconomic Models
    Macroeconomic Performance
    Macroeconomic Planning
    Macroeconomic Policies
    Macroeconomic Reform
    Macroeconomic Stabilization
    Income Distribution
    Demographic Indicators
    Social Justice
    Price stabilization
    Food prices
    Price policy
    Development Indicators
    Environmental Indicators
    Economic Indicators
    Educational Indicators
    Demographic Indicators
    Health Indicators
    Disadvantaged Groups
    Low Income Groups
    Socially Disadvantaged Children
    Social change
    Social accounting
    Inequality of income
    Economic growth
    Quality of Life
    Open price system
    Price fixing
    Price regulation
    Consumer price indexes
    Poor
    Economic forecasting
    Economic Zones
    Health expectancy
    Social groups
    Political participation
    Distribution of income
    Developing countries
    Rural community development
    Mass society
    Social change
    Social policy
    Social stability
    Population
    Sustainable development
    Show allCollapse
    Citable URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11540/10564
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Thumbnail
    KIEPopinions_no106.pdf (220.9Kb)
    Author
    Han, Minsoo
    Theme
    Poverty
    Economics
     
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise
    Copyright 2016-2021 Asian Development Bank Institute, except as explicitly marked otherwise